Nfp Benefits Compliance Podcast

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon discuss the US importation policies and rules aimed at lowering domestic prescription drug costs. Suzanne walks through the legalities of drug importation generally and then outlines the specific programs by which states can develop importation plans. Chase and Suzanne discuss several state importation proposals and how they could potentially bring savings to US consumers. Suzanne closes by addressing Canadian concerns relating to potential US drug importation.

In this episode, Chase Cannon and Suzanne Spradley remind employers about important ACA employer mandate reporting deadlines with the IRS, including a change in electronic reporting in 2024 for smaller employers. Chase also outlines some updated numbers relating to the federal poverty line (FPL), ACA affordability calculations and ACA penalty amounts, which are all adjusted annually. Suzanne and Chase finish with a discussion on an IRS alert regarding wellness vendors that are erroneously claiming certain expenses are “medical care” under the IRS rules.

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon give an overview of the No Surprises Act (NSA) — a consumer health protection law that places certain requirements on providers and payers (insurers and group health plans). Suzanne describes the main requirements under the NSA and introduces the Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process, which is an integral part of the NSA’s implementation. Suzanne and Chase discuss the challenges facing the IDR in its first few years, as well as the legal challenges to the federal guidance outlining IDR procedures and practices. Suzanne closes with a discussion of what to look for in 2024 and how the NSA and IDR may impact employers.

In this episode, Chase Cannon and Suzanne Spradley discuss employer compliance with the HIPAA privacy and security rules via lessons learned from three new HHS HIPAA settlement announcements. Chase leads off with a high-level review of the HIPAA rules for both fully and self-insured plans and the importance of safeguarding protected health information (PHI). Chase and Suzanne discuss the background and scenarios that led to the HHS investigation, how unauthorized access to PHI arose in the three settlement scenarios, and the importance of employers running a HIPAA risk assessment to get ahead of potential HIPAA problems. Chase and Suzanne share practical tips on HIPAA compliance, including training employees, involving IT and Technology teams when developing policies and procedures, and controlling access points (servers, emails, etc.) to electronic and physical PHI.

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon discuss a recent circuit-level decision relating to employee termination and its interaction with a participant lawsuit based on ERISA Section 510 (which prohibits an employer’s interference with a plan participant’s right to benefits). Suzanne provides background on ERISA 510 and how it applies to employer’s group health plans. Suzanne and Chase analyze a case where an employer terminated an employee shortly after their return to work following a leave of absence for a medical procedure. The two close by discussing how the court weighed certain factors when determining the employer violated the participant’s Section 510 rights.

In this episode, Chase Cannon and Suzanne Spradley take a tour across the nation as they review several new regulatory developments in six states that could impact employers with employees or fully insured plans in those states. Chase outlines new or recently effective paid family leave rules in New York, Oregon, and Maine. Chase and Suzanne delve into the impact of 2024 rate adjustments relating to San Francisco’s Health Care Security Ordinance and New York’s Paid Family Leave laws, including updated notices and other information on which employers need awareness. The two attorneys also highlight several new Texas laws that implicate multiple employer welfare arrangements (MEWAs) and fully insured plan coverage of prescription drugs and ground ambulance services.

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon address a recent appellate-level court case that addresses ERISA preemption of a recently enacted Oklahoma state law regulating pharmacy benefit managers (PBM). Suzanne begins by laying the groundwork and history of ERISA and ERISA preemption. Suzanne and Chase discuss the Oklahoma state PBM law and the players in the court case challenging the applicability of that state law. Suzanne details the court’s analysis on the circumstances required for ERISA to preempt (overrule) a state law, and she covers the court’s opinion and decision. Suzanne and Chase conclude the podcast by discussing the impact of the court’s decision on employers.

In this episode, Chase Cannon and Suzanne Spradley discuss recent enforcement on MHPAEA. Chase jumps in with a description of DOL’s enforcement approach, including working through TPAs to identify plans that have or had ABA therapy exclusions. Suzanne and Chase discuss the administrative challenges with reprocessing ABA exclusion claims, which the DOL is asking TPAs to assist plans with. The two close with a high-level review of the recent DOL Enforcement Fact Sheet and promise a more in-depth review of the recent MHPAEA proposed regulations and report to Congress on the next podcast.

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon review several new pieces of proposed federal legislation coming out of the House. Suzanne discusses the Transparency in Billing Act, which requires hospitals to have better and more accurate billing practices, policies and procedures with respect to outpatient departments. Suzanne and Chase dive into two other proposed bills aimed at PBMs and prescription drug pricing and creating a more shoppable healthcare system. Suzanne closes with some highlights on a proposed bill aimed at increasing transparency in fees from PBMs and TPAs.

In this episode, Chase Cannon and Suzanne Spradley discuss a recent IRS memo on wellness benefit payments via employer-funded fixed indemnity plans. Chase outlines the various iterations and structure of vendor-promoted wellness programs, which usually purport huge employment tax savings for employers. Chase and Suzanne outline the relevant tax rules and where these programs usually run afoul of those laws. The two close with a discussion on the recent IRS memo and what it means for employers considering these types of programs.

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon review the CAA’s prohibition on gag clauses in TPA and service provider contracts, as well as the employer’s obligation to attest to the removal of gag clauses (due December 31, 2023, for the first time). Suzanne outlines the challenges employers and plans face when working with TPAs, and explores how recent guidance attempts to address those challenges. Additionally, Suzanne and Chase discuss two recent cases between plans and their TPAs. They examine how these cases may impact employers’ paths forward in complying with the CAA gag clause prohibition and attestation requirements.

In this episode, Chase Cannon and Suzanne Spradley discuss updates on the ACA preventive care mandate litigation, including a stay issued by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. HSA contribution limits become a topic of discussion, as the IRS recently published updated numbers. Chase and Suzanne also discuss a common problem for employers filing Form 5500 with respect to missing Schedule A information from carriers.

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon have a look at the national debt and debt ceiling and how they impact employers and their group health plans. Suzanne leads off with a discussion on the national debt and how Congress sets the debt ceiling. Suzanne and Chase go in depth on what a failure to raise the debt ceiling and/or default on debt could mean for the healthcare industry. Suzanne closes with a discussion on mandatory and discretionary spending and how the tax exclusion for employer-provided benefits could potentially be at risk.

In this episode, Chase Cannon and Suzanne Spradley review several recent HIPAA violation settlements from the HHS Office for Civil Rights. Chase starts off by reviewing the general HIPAA obligations of fully and self-insured plans, including the importance of a HIPAA risk assessment. Chase and Suzanne discuss three real-life scenarios outlining ways in which companies experienced HIPAA breaches. Chase emphasizes the importance of a solid IT and technology team as part of a company’s HIPAA privacy and security strategy, including the development and implementation of certain policies and procedures. The two also discuss lessons learned from the settlements in the context of an employer group health plan.

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon discuss a recent Texas court ruling that invalidates a portion of the ACA’s preventive services coverage requirement. Suzanne provides a background of the plaintiffs and their arguments, including a Constitutional problem with the way the government appointed officers under the ACA and a religious freedom violation. Suzanne and Chase discuss the court’s decision, including the potential for a stay (hold) on the decision and the decision’s impact on fully and self-insured plans.

In this episode, Chase Cannon and Suzanne Spradley address recent IRS guidance that mandates electronic filing of certain tax forms – including Forms 1095-C – for smaller employers. Chase describes the background from Congress and the IRS and explains what it means now that any employer filing 10 or more forms (previously, this was 250) will be required to do so through the IRS electronic filing system. Suzanne and Chase discuss the impact on smaller employers, along with updated employer mandate penalties and certain state filing requirements for employers. Chase closes with an outline of a proposed bill in Congress addressing benefits continuation for employees locked out or participating in a strike.

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon discuss potential activity at the federal and state level relating to PBM transparency. Suzanne begins the discussion by outlining a few proposals from Congress that attempt to hold PBMs accountable for unfair and deceptive practices that may be driving up prescription drug costs. Suzanne then addresses a few state proposals that attempt to regulate PBMs. Suzanne and Chase close by discussing the potential impact on employers and their group health plans.

In this episode, Beth Allen and Chase Cannon look at several new developments for plan compliance in 2023. The two start with the recent announcement on the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency, which impacts the outbreak period and extension of timeframes for certain compliance deadlines. Chase then dives in on the CAA 2023 extension of relief for telehealth services in conjunction with HSA eligibility. Chase and Beth close by outlining several state compliance challenges, including state law interaction with telehealth services and the ever-evolving landscape of state paid family and medical leave laws.

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon highlight several areas of healthcare policy and compliance that will be on center stage in 2023. Suzanne starts with a discussion of transparency in healthcare and prescription drug costs, including several compliance requirements that will take effect in 2023. Suzanne and Chase discuss state compliance challenges, including abortion travel coverage, paid family and medical leave, and new legislation aimed at providers (but could indirectly impact employers). Suzanne closes by addressing the extension of telehealth relief with respect to HSA eligibility and what to look for in 2023 on the mental health parity analysis requirement.

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon discuss several recent COBRA cases. Suzanne starts by outlining several class action lawsuits filed against employers and plan sponsors relating to deficiencies in an employer health plan’s COBRA election notice. Suzanne and Chase discuss the use of the DOL’s Model Election Notice and how that usage interacts with potential DOL regulatory fines and participant lawsuits, and how employers can get into trouble by not including the appropriate information in the model or other election notices. Suzanne then describes a lawsuit against a single employer relating to a COBRA election notice delivery failure, including the involvement of a TPA.